Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Gilbert v. State of Illinois

1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 87 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1897-12-12
Disposition: denied
Cite as: Gilbert v. State of Illinois, 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 87 (1897)
Legacy General 1 denied 1890s Gilbert v. State of Illinois 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 87 1897-12-12 denied /opinions/v01-p0117-1/

ELIZABETH GILBERT v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant alleged that a state dam on the Illinois River caused water to back up and damage her land. The court found the land was not damaged by the dam, as it was above the dam's influence, and denied the claim.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WATER-damages caused by construction of dam. The court reviews evidence and finds that claimant's lands are not damaged by construction of dam in Illinois river by the State of Illinois.

ELIZABETH GILBERT

v.

THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 12, 1890.

WATER-damages caused by construction of dam. The court reviews evidence and finds that claimant's lands are not damaged by construction of dam in Illinois river by the State of Illinois.

The claimant filed her petition on the 20th day of October, 1879, setting forth that by authority of the State of Illinois a dam was constructed across the Illinois river at or near Copperas Creek; that the erection of said dam caused the water in the river opposite claimant's land to back up over her land and thereby to render it almost worthless, and that said lands will remain water soaked and almost worthless forever. The damage claimed is $880.

To this petition the statute of limitations and the general issue is interposed as a defense; and upon the petition, pleas, depositions and report of the surveyor, this cause is heard.

The evidence discloses the fact that on one tract of claimant's lands there is a creek running entirely through the tract; the head of the creek is found to be fifteen feet above the river at low water mark. The banks of this creek are low, and from this creek and not from the river the water spreads out over the claimant's land. The land is found by actual measurement to be from seventeen to twenty feet above old low water mark. We have no doubt but what these lands are becoming more thoroughly water soaked than they were in former years. Undoubtedly this condition would have existed had the dam never been erected. At all events the claimant's lands are found to be from ten to fourteen feet above that point where the dam ceases to have any effect on the river; and in the judgment of the Commission the claimant's lands are not damaged by the construction of the dam, and have therefore rejected this claim.

Official volume 1 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1905)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.