Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Reddick v. State of Illinois

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98 Illinois Court of Claims Filed January 1, 1908
Disposition: <caption-cut> Award: $2,000.00
Cite as: Reddick v. State of Illinois, 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98 (1908)
Legacy General 2 awarded 1900s Reddick v. State of Illinois 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98 January 1, 1908 <caption-cut> /opinions/v02-p0128-1/

v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

The claimant, administrator of the estate of Antonio Capodice, sought compensation for the death of a naval reservist who drowned during a boat drill. The court followed its prior decision in the Pimes case and awarded $2,000 for the benefit of the legal heirs.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

Cases cited: Reddick, admr. est. of Pimes, dec'd., v. State

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MILITARY SERVICE-Reddick, admr. est. Pimes v. State ante fol-

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed January 1, 1908.

MILITARY SERVICE-Reddick, admr. est. Pimes v. State ante followed. This claim is based upon the same state of facts as the claim of Reddick, admr. est. of Pimes, dec'd., v. State, supra, and the law as announced by the Court in the decision of that claim applies to this claim.

George E. Dawson, (R .C. Busse and Wm. Pettis, of Counsel) for Claimant.

W. H. Stead, Attorney General, Chas. E. Woodward, Assistant Attorney General, (Roy Wright, of Counsel) for State.

Deceased, Antonio Capodice, was a seaman of the First Division Illinois Naval Reserves, and with Joseph Pimes, et al., was drowned while at boat drill in Chicago harbor, on the night of July 5, 1906. The issues and proof as to the accident, as well as the stipulations under which the case is submitted, are the same in this case as in the Pimes case, and there discussed at length; and what we there said is decisive of this case, and in favor of claimant.

Claim was originally brought by James Reddick, administrator, who has since died; John F. Devine being appointed his successor, and in his own behalf as such, and for the next of kin; the petition was amended by adding as claimants Agostino Capodice, father, Anna Capodice, mother, Mateo, Ginseppe and Salvator Capodice, brothers, and Rosa and Corneliu Capodice, sisters, as his "next of kin and only heirs at law" and whom the proof shows to be the sole heirs at law of deceased, who died unmarried.

Our award in favor of claimant will be in the same amount as in the Pimes case. We accordingly award claimant, John F. Devine, administrator of the estate [*99] of Antonio Capodice (or Capodici), deceased, for the sole use and benefit of the legal heirs of said Antonio Capodice, deceased, the sum of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars.

Official volume 2 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1906–1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.