Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Hodgson v. State of Illinois

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 240 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1914-05-22
Disposition: denied
Cite as: Hodgson v. State of Illinois, 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 240 (1914)

EDWARD S. HODGSON v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

The claim was identical to Kinney v. State, and was rejected for the same reasons set forth in that opinion.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Kinney v. State

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES AND SALARIES-Kinney v. State ante followed. This case is PEYTON-PALMER CO. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS. 241

FEES AND SALARIES-Kinney v. State ante followed. This case is identical with that of Kinney v. State, supra. Adolph Bernard, for Claimant.

EDWARD S. HODGSON

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed May 22, 1914.

FEES AND SALARIES-Kinney v. State ante followed. This case is identical with that of Kinney v. State, supra.

Adolph Bernard, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

The claim in this case, is identical with the claim of James Kinney v. State of Illinois, in which an opinion was filed in this October Term, 1913.

The claim is rejected for the same reasons set forth in the above opinion.

Official volume 2 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1906–1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.