Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Anderson v. State of Illinois

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1914-11-19
Disposition: denied
Cite as: Anderson v. State of Illinois, 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 (1914)
Legacy General 2 denied 1910s Anderson v. State of Illinois 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 273 1914-11-19 denied /opinions/v02-p0303-1/

MONS ANDERSON v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Headnotes

  1. NON-LIABILITY OF STATE-Morrissey v. State ante followed. This

MONS ANDERSON

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed November 19, 1914.

NON-LIABILITY OF STATE-Morrissey v. State ante followed. This case is controlled by the decision of the Court in the case of Morrissey v. State, supra.

Chipperfield & Chipperfield, Browne & Wiley, Duncan, Doyle & O'Connor, Howard R. Bayne, George P. Hills, Gleim & Colwell, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, (Stead, Woodward & Hibbs, of Counsel), for State.

The facts in this case and the law applicable thereto are, excepting as to the degree of injury, the same as in the case of Morrissey v. State of Illinois.

Claimant was walking over the bridge when it collapsed. He fell into the water, was rendered unconscious and remained in the hospital seventeen days.

Previous to the accident his right leg had been amputated, and as a result of the accident he received lacerations on the stump of the leg, his left knee and ankle were sprained, he received a bruise on the right side of the body, and claims nervous breakdown. He admitted that he had nervous trouble and headaches prior to the injury.

On the authority of the Morrissey case, it is the judgment of the Court, that the claim be denied, without prejudice to the right of claimant to present his claim to the legislature, and with the statement, that if it were within our power, we would award to claimant the sum of five hundred dollars.

Official volume 2 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1906–1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.