Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Allen v. State of Illinois

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1914-12-17
Disposition: dismissed Agency: Game and Fish Commission
Cite as: Allen v. State of Illinois, 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 (1914)
Legacy General 2 dismissed 1910s Allen v. State of Illinois 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 300 1914-12-17 dismissed /opinions/v02-p0330-1/

HENRY C. ALLEN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought $250 for destruction of his launch in a fire while it was stored in a state boathouse. The court dismissed the claim, holding the State was not liable for the acts of third parties who caused the fire.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. NON-LIABILITY OF STATE-State not liable for acts of third parties.

HENRY C. ALLEN

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 17, 1914.

NON-LIABILITY OF STATE-State not liable for acts of third parties. Where property of claimant is destroyed by the acts of third parties, the State cannot be held liable therefor.

Edmund P. Nischwitz, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

The claimant in this case while an employee of the Game and Fish Commission of the State of Illinois, was directed by one of the officers of the commission, to use his launch in connection with the work in which he was engaged in and around Havana, Illinois.

Claimant's launch was used in this line of work for some time and when not in use was placed in a boathouse near Havana, together with several other launches belonging to the State.

On the night of August 27, 1913, the boat house was destroyed by fire and the claimant's launch, together with several other launches belonging to the State, was destroyed.

The State filed a general demurrer to claimant's declaration wherein claimant seeks to recover two hundred fifty ($250.00) dollars.

We do not believe the State was bound to exercise any greater care of claimant's property than was exercised in this case, and the State can not be held liable for the loss of claimant's property, as the record discloses, that the same was destroyed by the act of third parties, who were not in any manner under the control of the State.

We are of the opinion that the demurrer should be sustained.

Official volume 2 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1906–1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.