S. L. JAMES, TREASURER OF THE COUNTY OF EFFINGHAM, STATE OF ILLINOIS, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Case summary
The county treasurer paid inheritance taxes to the State without deducting appraisement costs. The court found the payment was made under a mistake of fact and awarded the treasurer $14.40 for the erroneously paid costs.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- 1. INHERITANCE TAX-facts held to justify an award. Claimant, 2. MISTAKE OF FACT-payment under. Money paid under a mis-
S. L. JAMES, TREASURER OF THE COUNTY OF EFFINGHAM, STATE OF ILLINOIS, v.
STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Opinion filed February 17, 1915. 1. INHERITANCE TAX-facts held to justify an award. Claimant, as county treasurer, paid into the State treasury inheritance taxes collected by him in the sum of $338.62. After such payment, it was ascertained that costs of appraisement to the extent of $14.40 had not been deducted. Held, that claimant is entitled to a return of the amount erroneously paid. 2. MISTAKE OF FACT-payment under. Money paid under a mistake of fact may be recovered, though not if paid under a mistake of law.
The claimant in this case is the county treasurer of Effingham County, and as such county treasurer there was paid to him by the administrator of the estate of William Abraham, an inheritance tax amounting to $345.63, on the 12th day of December, 1914. After deducting the two per cent allowed to the county treasurer for collecting the same, he remitted the balance, $338.62, to the State Treasurer. After remitting the same, he ascertained there was due as costs in the county court of Effingham County, the sum of $14.40, being the clerk's fee $5.00, O. P. Denton, for transcribing testimony $7.50 and A. L. Abraham, witness fee $1.90, which amounts should have been deducted out of the said tax before the same was remitted to the State treasury.
We have examined the authorities, and applying the same as we see them to the facts in this case which discloses that this money was paid through an oversight or a mistake of fact, and not through a mistake of law, we are of the opinion that claimant is entitled to an award.
We, therefore, award claimant, S. L. James, the sum of fourteen dollars and forty cents ($14.40).