O. H. SEIFERT v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought an award for services performed in connection with the Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners. The court followed its decision in B. A. Smith v. State and awarded $119.20.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: B. A. Smith v. State

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

FEES AND SALARIES-B. A. Smith v. State ante followed. This claim is

FEES AND SALARIES-B. A. Smith v. State ante followed. This claim is governed by the decision of the Court in B. A. Smith v. State, supra. E. J. Frankhauser, for Claimant.

O. H. SEIFERT

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 22, 1918.

FEES AND SALARIES-B. A. Smith v. State ante followed. This claim is governed by the decision of the Court in B. A. Smith v. State, supra.

E. J. Frankhauser, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State.

Claimant is seeking an award for services performed in connection with the Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners. The facts are practically the same as those in the case of B. A. Smith v. State of Illinois, in which case an opinion was filed at this term.

Our conclusions are the same and we therefore make an award in favor of the claimant for $119.20.