Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Kochley v. State of Illinois

3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 117 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1918-05-12
Disposition: awarded Award: $280.00
Cite as: Kochley v. State of Illinois, 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 117 (1918)

ANTHONY KOCHLEY v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for services. The court followed the precedent in Huenig v. State and awarded $280.00.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Huenig v. State, ante

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Services-Huenig v. State, ante followed. The facts in this case are governed by the facts in the case of John Huenig v. State of Illinois, supra. T. J. Condon, for Claimant.

ANTHONY KOCHLEY

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed May 12, 1918.

Services-Huenig v. State, ante followed. The facts in this case are governed by the facts in the case of John Huenig v. State of Illinois, supra.

T. J. Condon, for Claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State.

This case is similar to the case of John W. Huenig in which case an opinion has been filed this date. For the reasons assigned in that case, we make an award to claimant in this case of two hundred eighty and 00/100 ($280.00) dollars.

Official volume 3 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.