Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

The Times Record Company v. State of Illinois

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 180 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1921-04-26
Disposition: awarded Award: $73.50
Cite as: The Times Record Company v. State of Illinois, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 180 (1921)
Legacy General 4 awarded 1920s The Times Record Company v. State of Illinois 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 180 1921-04-26 awarded /opinions/v04-p0195-1/

THE TIMES RECORD COMPANY, ACORPORATION v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for publishing notices of dissolution suits against corporations. The court allowed the claim in the amount of $73.50, with the Attorney General's consent, finding it proper.

Claim type: Contract

Cases cited: Shaw v. Brockman

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PUBLICATION NOTICE-liability of State. This case is similar to that of

THE TIMES RECORD COMPANY, A CORPORATION

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed April 26, 1921.

PUBLICATION NOTICE-liability of State. This case is similar to that of Shaw v. Brockman, supra, and the decision of the Court here announced governs this claim.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State This is a claim for seventy-three and 50/100 dollars ($73.50) filed by claimant against the State for publishing notices of the pendency of suit by the State to dissolve certain corporations therein mentioned, on account of failure to file annual report, under Act in force July 1, 1901, as amended by Act in force July 1, 1917, said notices having been published in "The Times Record", a weekly newspaper of Mercer county.

The Attorney General consents to the allowance of this claim and the claim, with the affidavit in support thereof, seems to show on its face that it is proper and should be allowed.

The claim is therefore allowed in the sum of seventy-three and 50/100 dollars ($73.50).

Official volume 4 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1923)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.