Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

William L. Petty v. State of Illinois

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 201 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1921-04-17
Disposition: dismissed Agency: Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet
Cite as: William L. Petty v. State of Illinois, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 201 (1921)
Legacy General 4 dismissed 1920s William L. Petty v. State of Illinois 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 201 1921-04-17 dismissed /opinions/v04-p0216-1/

William L. Petty, Jr. v. State of Illinois.

Case summary

Claimant, a guard at the penitentiary, was attacked by a convict and sought compensation for his injuries. The court held that the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to the State when exercising a governmental function, and dismissed the claim, but recommended the legislature appropriate up to $1,000 as relief.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Cases cited: Little v. State, supra

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

William L. Petty, Jr. v.

State of Illinois.

Opinion filed April 17, 1921.

Hernodeat Superior-Little v. State, supra, followed. This case is similar to that of Little v. State, supra, and the decision of the Court as announced in that case governs this case.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State.

The claimant, William L. Petty, Jr., was employed as a guard, or keeper, at the penitentiary at Joliet; that while in charge of a detail of seventeen convicts unloading gravel from a railroad car in the yard of the penitentiary, a convict by the name of Moore attacked the claimant with a knife, which he had concealed in his hand, and in the attack the claimant was cut from the back of his neck around to the cheek bone on the left side of the face, leaving an ugly scar six or eight inches long.

And it appears from the evidence that the scar is made in such a manner that no one can shave him without nicking him on the healed wound.

It is the opinion of this Court that the doctrine of respondeat superior is not applicable to the State, and that the State in conducting the State penitentiary exercises a governmental function and is not liable for injuries to those in attendance in said institution or to those in its employ. Therefore, the Court finds that there is no legal liability against the State of Illinois under this claim. However, the Court recommends, under the circumstances of this case, if the Legislature sees fit to waive the legal defenses of the State, it would be an act of justice to appropriate not to exceed ten hundred dollars ($1,000.00) as relief and compensation for all injuries sustained by claimant in this action.

Official volume 4 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1923)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.