Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

The Monroe Binder Board Co. v. State of Illinois

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 219 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1922-05-09
Disposition: awarded Award: $167.08
Cite as: The Monroe Binder Board Co. v. State of Illinois, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 219 (1922)
Legacy General 4 awarded 1920s The Monroe Binder Board Co. v. State of Illinois 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 219 1922-05-09 awarded /opinions/v04-p0234-1/

THE MONROE BINDER BOARD CO. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of a franchise tax in the amount of $167.08. The State did not object, and the court awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when claimant entitled to a refund. There being no

THE MONROE BINDER BOARD CO. v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed May 9, 1922.

FRANCHISE TAX-when claimant entitled to a refund. There being no dispute as to the facts and law governing this case the Court enters an order in favor of claimant for the amount of his claim.

EDWARD J. BRUNDAGE, Attorney General, for State.

THIS is a claim brought by the Monroe Binder Board Co., of Monroe, Michigan for a refund of a certain franchise tax amounting to one hundred sixty-seven dollars and eight cents ($167.08). No objection or defense of the claim is interposed by or on behalf of the State and the honorable Attorney General consents to an award herein in the sum of one hundred sixty-seven dollars and eight cents ($167.08). Therefore said sum is hereby allowed.

Official volume 4 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1923)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.