Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Wolff Mfg. Corp. v. Nois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 13 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1924-05-14 No. 733
Disposition: (No. 733-Claimant awarded $3,020.00.) Award: $3,020.00
Cite as: Wolff Mfg. Corp. v. Nois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 13 (1924)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Wolff Mfg. Corp. v. Nois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 13 1924-05-14 (No. 733-Claimant awarded $3,020.00.) /opinions/v05-p0033-2/

WOLFF MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of franchise taxes paid under duress and protest in excess of the amount legally due. The Attorney General admitted the facts and consented to an award, and the court recommended allowing the sum of $3,020.00.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WOLFF MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLI- FRANCHISE TAX-tax paid under duress will be refunded. Where the tax

This is a claim filed by the claimant corporation for moneys paid to the State under duress and protest as and for [*14] its franchise tax for the year beginning July 1, 1922, in excess of the amount legally due to the State under the provisions of the General Corporation Act. The claimant alleges that the excess amount paid by them would amount to $3,020.00.

The Attorney General files his statement herein and admits the facts in this case as they are alleged in the declaration filed by the claimant in this court and consents to an award in favor of the claimant in the sum of $3,020.00.

It is therefore recommended by the court that said claimant be allowed the sum of $3,020.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.