Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Grinnell Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1923-05-14 No. 762
Disposition: (No. 762-Claimant awarded $232.00.) Award: $232.00 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Grinnell Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 (1923)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Grinnell Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 1923-05-14 (No. 762-Claimant awarded $232.00.) /opinions/v05-p0034-1/

GRINNELL COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought $232.00 for materials sold and delivered to the Department of Public Works and Buildings for use at the Illinois State Reformatory. The claim was approved by the Division of Purchases and Supplies and the Attorney General consented to the award, so the court awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACT-when State liable-supplies furnished. The State is liable for

This is a claim filed by Grinnell Company, Inc., in the sum of $232.00, for material sold and delivered by the claimant to the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois, and for the use of the Illinois State Reformatory at Pontiac, Illinois, a State institution under the supervision and control of the said State of Illinois.

This claim has been investigated by the superintendent of the Division of Purchases and Supplies, Department of Public Works and Buildings, of the State of Illinois, and has been approved by that official.

The Attorney General of Illinois consents to an award in this case in the sum of $232.00.

The court therefore awards the claimant the sum of $232.00 in settlement of this claim.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.