Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Emery v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 32 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1924-09-11 No. 807
Disposition: (No. 807-Claimant awarded $130.34 with interest.) Award: $130.34
Cite as: Emery v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 32 (1924)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Emery v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 32 1924-09-11 (No. 807-Claimant awarded $130.34 with interest.) /opinions/v05-p0052-1/

LILLIAN C. EMERY, Executrix, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought refund of inheritance tax erroneously paid. The court found that due to contingencies in the will, a reassessment reduced the tax, and awarded a refund of $130.34 with interest.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. INHERITANCE TAX-when refund may be made-Sec. 25. Where an in-

This is for claim for refund of inheritance tax erroneously paid to the State of Illinois. William R. Emery died March 13, 1919, leaving a last will and testament with codicil thereto, which were admitted to probate in Cook County, Illinois.

The petitioner is the widow of said deceased. In an order duly entered of record by the county judge September 19, 1919, fixing amount of inheritance tax to be paid at $1304.20, being the amount less 5% discount allowed by statute, July 21, 1920, the estate was declared closed and executrix discharged.

On account of the happenings of certain contingencies expressed in the will, a copy of which is filed as evidence in the case, under Section 25 of Revenue act, the claimant became entitled to a re-assessment of the inheritance taxes.

Thereupon June 17, 1924, the claimant filed her petition in said county court of Cook County, praying for a re-assessment in accordance with the statute in such case made and provided; and an order was made re-assessing said inheritance tax at $1235.64 less the 5% discount allowed by statute, which equaled $1173.86. The amount of tax actually paid therefor was $1304.20. It is therefore clear that the claimant is entitled to a refund of $130.34, with interest thereon from September 19, 1919, at 3% per annum.

The claimant is accordingly awarded the sum of $130.34 with 3% thereon per annum from September 19, 1919.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.