Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Eisenstaedt v. Nois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-01-28 No. 793
Disposition: (No. 793-Claimant awarded $1938.20 with interest.) Award: $1,938.20
Cite as: Eisenstaedt v. Nois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Eisenstaedt v. Nois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54 1925-01-28 (No. 793-Claimant awarded $1938.20 with interest.) /opinions/v05-p0074-1/

CARRIE EISENSTAEDT, EXECUTRIX UNDER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LEOPOLD EISENSTAEDT, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought a refund of inheritance taxes overpaid due to a mistake in the original assessment. The court awarded $1,938.20 with interest, as the Attorney General consented.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. OF LEOPOLD EISENSTAEDT, Deceased, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLI- INHERITANCE TAX-when refund made, Sec. 25. Where it appears that an SONNENSCHEIN, BERKSON, LAUTMANN & LEVINSON, for claim-

Carrie Eisenstaedt, executrix under the last will and testament of Leopold Eisenstaedt, deceased, files this claim to recover an award as refund in the sum of $1,938.20.

The facts in the case are that Leopold Eisenstaedt, a resident of the City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, died in Chicago May 14, 1923, leaving a last will and testament dated [*55] January 3, 1903, with a codicil thereto attached dated May 21, 1912, which said last will and testament and codicil were duly approved and admitted to record in the probate court of Cook County, Illinois, June 11, 1923, and letters testamentary were duly issued to petitioner as executrix and by an order duly entered of record in the county court of said county November 15, 1923; inheritance tax appraisement was duly approved and the cash value of the successions, interests, estates, legacies, transfers, gifts and property which the parties interested under the said will were entitled to receive by reason of the death of the decedent and fixed the amount of taxes to which the same was liable at the total sum of $3,399.05, and petitioner, as executrix as aforesaid, paid the sum of $3,229.10 in full of the inheritance taxes assessed, being the full amount thereof of $3,399.05 less the discount of 5% allowed by statute for the payment of said taxes, within six months from the date of the death of decedent.

The appraiser in fixing the inheritance tax overlooked said codicil and by a mistake of fact assessed the tax upon the basis of succession through the second and third clauses of said will, instead of through the said codicil, and assessed Carrie Eisenstaedt, widow, upon the value of her widow's award and the value of a life estate in the remaining assets and assessed Carrie Eisenstaedt as trustee upon the entire remainder of the estate as though trustee, for the use, and benefit of nieces or nephew of decedent.

By reason of the said mistake, the petitioner, under Section 25 of the Revenue act, became entitled to a re-assessment of the inheritance taxes as aforesaid and upon the 19th day of May, 1924, a petitioner secured an order through the said county court reassessing said taxes, and by reason of entry of said order, the amount of inheritance taxes which should be paid by the claimant is $1,958.54, less the 5% discount allowed by the statute, making a total sum which should be paid of $1,260.90.

The amount of inheritance tax actually paid to the county treasurer of Cook County by petitioner was $3,229.10, and the claimant, by reason of the reduction of said taxes, became entitled to a refund of $1,938.20, together with interest from November 14, 1923, at the rate of 3% per annum.

To all of this the Attorney General consents and agrees to an award in the sum claimed. [*56]

It is therefore the order of the court that the claimant be awarded the sum of $1,938.20, together with interest thereon at the rate of 3% per annum from November 14, 1923.

No. 846-Claimant awarded $323.78 with interest.

FLORENCE E. HORTON, EXECUTRIX OF LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF FRANK L. HORTON, Deceased, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed January 28, 1925.

INHERITANCE TAX-refund under Sec. 25-when made. Where an inheritance tax has been assessed and paid under Section 25, of Inheritance Tax Law, expectant upon the happening of a contingency which does not happen, and upon a re-assessment of the tax, in a proper proceeding, a lesser tax is found to be due the State, claimant is entitled to a refund of the difference between the amount of the tax paid, and the amount found to be due upon the re-assessment.

ALBERT AND HENRY VEEDER, for claimant.

EDWARD J. BRUNDAGE, Attorney General; GEORGE C. DIXON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. JUSTICE PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the court: This is a suit brought by Florence E. Horton, executrix of the last will and testament of Frank L. Horton, deceased, to recover from the State $323.78 as refund of inheritance taxes paid under Section 25 of the inheritance tax laws of this State.

The claimant is the widow of said deceased, a legatee and executrix of the last will of said decedent, who died a resident of Swansea, in the State of Massachusetts, on the 8th day of February, A. D. 1923.

On August 1, 1923, the county judge of Cook County, Illinois, entered an order assessing the taxable property liable for payment of inheritance tax in Illinois and belonging to the estate of said deceased, and fixed the inheritance taxes then to be paid in the sum of $2,199.02, which, less 5%, equals $109.95, and making $2089.07 actually paid August 4, 1923, to the county treasurer of said Cook County. It was paid on the assumption that claimant, the widow, would die within one year.

She still survives, and after the expiration of one year it was lawful and proper for the claimant to make proper application to the county judge to have the property re-appraised [*57] and the inheritance taxes re-assessed. Accordingly, on September 19, 1924, the county court of Cook County had the property re-appraised and found the inheritance taxes due to be $1859.25, as shown by copy of the record of said order filed herein.

The said inheritance taxes, $1859.25 less $92.96 (being the 5% statutory discount if paid in six months) equals $1766.29, which, deducted from the amount paid, equals $322.78, amount due petitioner. The petitioner computes the amount due to be $323.78, which is evidently a clerical error, as will appear by her figures. The Attorney General admits the liability of the State in the said sum of $322.78.

The court accordingly awards claimant the sum of $322.78, with 3% interest per annum from the 4th day of August, A. D. 1923, the date of the payment of the taxes by claimant.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.