Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Temple v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-04-16 No. 820
Disposition: (No. 820-Claimant awarded $792.00.) Award: $792.00 Agency: University of Illinois
Cite as: Temple v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Temple v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 94 1925-04-16 (No. 820-Claimant awarded $792.00.) /opinions/v05-p0114-1/

GEORGE TEMPLE & ARTHUR R. TEMPLE, Partners, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants purchased hogs from the University of Illinois that were infected with disease. The court found the hogs were sick and should not have been sold, and awarded $792.00 for the last lot of eighty-one hogs.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SALES-when State liable. The State is liable to refund the purchase of

This is a claim for a loss arising out of a purchase of hogs from the University of Illinois by the claimants.

It appears that the defendant maintains and operates a department of animal husbandry as a part of Agricultural Experiment Station in connection with the University of Illinois, situated in Urbana, in Champaign County.

It appears that said institution carried on experiment matters and kept hogs for experimental purposes or otherwise.

It is claimed that a lot of twenty-five hogs were sold to the claimants by the authorities of such university, paying therefor $160.00; that claimants afterwards purchased eighty-one hogs, paying therefor $792.00; that this latter lot of hogs were infected with "flu," a contagious and infectious disease of swine.

It is further alleged that agents at such university knew of the diseased condition of the hogs.

The defendant appears and objects to the allowance of this claim.

The claimant also claims damages on account of loss of other hogs, feed, etc.

The court is of the opinion that to go beyond the question of eighty-one hogs sold, that would get into the realm of speculative damages. [*95]

However, from all the evidence, the court is of the opinion that the hogs were not well, that is, the bunch of eighty-one last sold to claimants were sick and should not have been sold.

Therefore, the court recommends an allowance of the sum of $792.00, which is an allowance on account of the eighty-one hogs last sold.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.