Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Underwood v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 97 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-04-16 No. 831
Disposition: (No. 831-Claimant awarded $801.15.) Award: $801.15 Agency: Chicago State Hospital
Cite as: Underwood v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 97 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Underwood v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 97 1925-04-16 (No. 831-Claimant awarded $801.15.) /opinions/v05-p0117-1/

GEORGE B. UNDERWOOD AND LEAH UNDERWOOD, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought $801.15 for personal property destroyed in a fire at the Chicago State Hospital. The court found no legal liability but allowed the claim in equity.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY LOSS-award may be made to State employee. Where the

The claimants, George B. Underwood and Leah Underwood, his wife, file their claim for damages in the sum of $801.15 for loss of their clothing, wearing apparel and household goods and chattels, burned and destroyed by fire at the Chicago State Hospital December 26, 1923.

Claimants were in the employ of the State at said hospital at and a long time before the fire, and occupied quarters in the said building. The goods lost were necessary for a proper equipment of their rooms so occupied by them. The origin of the fire, so far as the evidence discloses, is unknown to claimants or defendant, and without fault on part of any of the parties. It was a very disastrous fire, destroying a number of lives of the inmates, much personal property and partially destroying the building. Claimants were not in the room containing their goods at time of the fire, but were about the premises engaged in their usual daily duties for the State, and it was impossible to save the goods, as disclosed by the evidence. The claimants had no attorney to present their claims, and taking evidence was conducted by Mr. George W. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General.

A bill of particulars was filed, itemizing all the articles lost, their original cost prices and a fair cash present value [*98] at time of their destruction by fire. The claim is verified by the oaths of claimants, and corroborated by the evidence of other witnesses.

While it has been often held by this court that the State is not legally liable in such cases, yet in the interest of social justice and equity, we are of the opinion that the entire demand should be allowed.

We accordingly award claimants the sum of $801.15.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.