Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Wilson v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 137 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 736
Disposition: (No. 736-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) Award: $3,000.00 Agency: Kankakee State Hospital for the Insane
Cite as: Wilson v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 137 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Wilson v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 137 1925-05-01 (No. 736-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) /opinions/v05-p0157-2/

LOUISE WILSON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, an inmate at Kankakee State Hospital, lost an eye when a nurse negligently closed a window, causing glass to fall. The court initially denied the claim as injury by a fellow patient, but on rehearing found the nurse's negligence created state liability and awarded $3,000.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when State liable for injury to inmate. An award

This is a claim filed by an inmate of the Kankakee State Hospital for the Insane about March 15, 1922. In a former [*138] presentation of this case it appeared that the injuries complained of were caused by a fellow patient, but on a subsequent hearing it appeared to the court that the injury complained of was occasioned by a nurse employed in said hospital, who closed a window so violently and suddenly that the glass fell out and injured the eye of the patient. According to the rule of this court an award would not be justified in a case where the injury was sustained through the action of a fellow patient. However, in a case where the injury complained of appears to be through the negligence of an attendant it would appear that a liability on the part of the State would prevail. The loss of an eye is very serious, not alone by reason of the loss of sight but the great pain and sorrow would also be an element to consider.

Upon reconsideration of this case it is the opinion of the court that an allowance be made the complainant. Therefore it is recommended that the claimant be allowed the sum of $3,000.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.