Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Edwin O. Linden v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 150 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 785
Disposition: (No. 785-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Edwin O. Linden v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 150 (1925)
Legacy General 5 denied 1920s Edwin O. Linden v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 150 1925-05-01 (No. 785-Claim denied.) /opinions/v05-p0170-1/

EDWIN O. LINDEN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought soldier's compensation under the bonus act. The court denied the claim, agreeing with the State that the service recognition board had exclusive jurisdiction over such claims.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. BONUS ACT-court is without jurisdiction. The court is without jurisdiction to consider a claim of a soldier for compensation under the Bonus act. SAME-Service Recognition Board. The Service Recognition Board has exclusive jurisdiction in the consideration of claim of soldier under the Bonus act.

This is a claim for soldier's compensation. The State, by its Attorney General, comes and files its statement denying the legal or equitable right of the claimant and alleges that this court is without jurisdiction, owing to the fact that the intention of the bonus act was to vest the service recognition board with exclusive jurisdiction and pass upon and finally dispose of all claims filed under that act.

It is the opinion of the court that this contention is correct. Therefore, the claim is denied.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.