Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Smith v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 157 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 821
Disposition: (No. 821-Claimant awarded $2,950.00.) Award: $2,950.00
Cite as: Smith v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 157 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Smith v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 157 1925-05-01 (No. 821-Claimant awarded $2,950.00.) /opinions/v05-p0177-1/

ED. S. SMITH, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a metal mine inspector, sought back pay for the difference between the salary paid and the statutory salary. The court found he was entitled to recover the difference and awarded $2,950.00.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

Statutes cited: Section 95, Chapter 93 of the Smith-Hurd, Illinois Statute

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES & SALARIES-when State liable. An employee of the State is entitled to receive the salary fixed by statute pertaining to his employment, and the State is liable therefor.

The claimant was appointed in due course as metal mine inspector and entered upon the duties of his position the 16th day of February, 1922, and has continued as such inspector from the time of his appointment until the filing of his declaration.

The plaintiff alleges that his salary was fixed by the laws of the State of Illinois, Section 95, Chapter 93 of the Smith-Hurd, Illinois Statute, that the amount so fixed was $3,600.00 a year, that part of the time he was paid $250.00 per month and part of the time $125.00 per month.

It appears from the record further, that the difference between the amount paid him and the amount allowed by the statute up to July 1, 1924, amounts to the sum of $2,950.00.

It does not appear from the declaration that the claimant asked for any further relief.

The Attorney General comes and files his demurrer.

It is the opinion of this court after examining all the records that this claimant entered upon his duties under the statute fixing his salary at $3,600.00 per year for the term of his appointment and therefore in equity and social justice, as well as law, is entitled to recover for the services rendered.

It is therefore recommended by the court that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,950.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.