Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Parmly v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 884
Disposition: (No. 884-Claimant awarded $2,679.01.) Award: $2,679.01
Cite as: Parmly v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Parmly v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 1925-05-01 (No. 884-Claimant awarded $2,679.01.) /opinions/v05-p0204-1/

SAMUEL P. PARMLY, JR. AND CLARA S. PARMLY, EXECUTORS OF SAM- UEL P. PARMLY, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Re- spondent.

Case summary

The executors of Samuel P. Parmly's estate claimed a refund of inheritance taxes paid under Section 25 of the Illinois Inheritance Tax laws. The court, with the Attorney General's consent, awarded the claimants the sum of $2,679.01.

Claim type: Tax Refund

Statutes cited: Section 25, Inheritance Tax laws of Illinois

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SAMUEL P. PARMLY, JR. AND CLARA S. PARMLY, EXECUTORS OF SAM- UEL P. PARMLY, Deceased, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Re- INHERITANCE TAX-when claimant entitled to refund under Sec. 25. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimants, Samuel P. Parmly, Jr., and Clara S. Parmly, executors of the estate of Samuel P. Parmly, deceased, claim a refund in the sum of $2,679.01 of inheritance [*185] taxes, paid under the provisions of Section 25, Inheritance Tax laws of Illinois.

On proper proceedings in the county, it is found that said sum was found to be due to claimants on refund. Copies of order of the court are on file.

The Attorney General in writing consents to an award in the sum claimed. The court on examination of all the evidence and on consent of the Attorney General finds the claimants are entitled to a refund of the said sum and the court accordingly awards the claimants the sum of $2,079.01.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.