Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Peoria & Pekin Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 243 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-01-19 No. 831
Disposition: (No. 831-Claimant awarded $379.00.) Award: $379.00 Agency: Peoria State Hospital
Cite as: Peoria & Pekin Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 243 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Peoria & Pekin Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 243 1927-01-19 (No. 831-Claimant awarded $379.00.) /opinions/v05-p0263-1/

PEORIA & PEKIN UNION RAILWAY COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought $379.00 in demurrage charges for coal cars shipped to the State Hospital at Bartonville. The court found that the preponderance of evidence showed proper notice of constructive placement was given, and awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DEMURRAGE-when State liable. Where the State through its authorized

The claimant, the Peoria and Pekin Union Railway Company, have filed a claim in the sum of $379.00 on account of demurrage on cars of coal shipped to the State Hospital at Bartonville, Illinois. The case hinges on the fact as to whether or not defendant had received notice as to the constructive placement of those cars, under the following provision: "When delivery of a car consigned or ordered to an industrial interchange track, or to other than a public delivery track cannot be made on account of the inability of the consignee receiving it or because of any other condition attributable to the consignee, such car will be held at destination or, if it cannot reasonably be accommodated there, at the nearest available holding point, and written notice that the car is held and that this railroad is unable to deliver, will be sent or given to the consignee. This will be considered constructive placement." (Item No. 7, Rule 5, Sec. A. of Rules and Regulations contained in Freight Tariff No. 4-J.) There is a direct conflict in the testimony of J. B. Conway, an employee at the Peoria State Hospital, and three witnesses introduced by claimant. We believe that the preponderance of the evidence proves that notices were given as provided for under said rules and regulations, above cited, and that claimant is entitled to be awarded the amount of its claim.

We therefore award to claimant, the Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Company, the sum of $379.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.