Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Watling Manufacturing Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 257 1927-01-19 (No. 982-Claimant awarded $192.50.) /opinions/v05-p0277-1/ WATLING MANUFACTURING CO., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought a refund of a franchise tax erroneously paid after its charter had expired. The court awarded $192.50 because no tax was due.
Claim type: Tax Refund
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be made. Where a franchise tax has
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-
FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be made. Where a franchise tax has been erroneously paid after the expiration of charter of the corporation it is entitled to a refund of the tax paid. BANOS & FRANKHAUSER, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for a refund of a franchise tax erroneously paid by claimant to the Secretary of State after the expiration of its charter in January, 1924.
It is admitted by the Secretary of State that claimant's charter had expired prior to the payment, and the Attorney General has filed his written consent to an award being allowed claimant in the sum of $192.50.
As it is clear no tax was due from claimant we accordingly award it the sum of $192.50.
Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.