Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 260 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-01-18 No. 897
Disposition: (No. 897-Claimant awarded $797.97.) Award: $797.97 Agency: Division of Insurance of the Department of Trade and Commerce
Cite as: St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 260 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 260 1927-01-18 (No. 897-Claimant awarded $797.97.) /opinions/v05-p0280-1/

SAINT PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought a refund of $797.97 in privilege tax overpaid to the Division of Insurance in 1925 due to a missed credit. The court found the double payment was admitted by the Superintendent of Insurance and the Attorney General consented, so the award was allowed.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PRIVILEGE TAX-when refund may be made. Overpayment. Where a OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim filed by the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company for a refund of $797.97 privilege tax overpaid to the Division of Insurance of the Department of Trade and Commerce of the State of Illinois in the year 1925. This [*291] amount was paid by claimant to the city collector of the city of Chicago, and, under the provisions of the statute, should have been credited on the amount of its assessment for the year 1924, payable in 1925, but by oversight the credit was not given.

The Attorney General has filed a statement on behalf of the State to which is attached as an exhibit a letter of the Superintendent of Insurance which admits that claimant should have had a credit of $797.97 on its privilege tax for that year, and advises that the claim be allowed.

The Attorney General accordingly consents that an award be allowed claimant in the sum of $797.97. It is manifest that claimant has paid a double tax to the extent of the claim filed and we therefore allow it an award of $797.97.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.