Legacy General 5 denied 1920s Dearborn Chemical Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 280 1927-03-10 (No. 713-Claim denied.) /opinions/v05-p0300-1/ WILL & BAUMER CANDLE CO., INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought a refund of a franchise tax, but the court denied the claim, following its decision in Moline Plow Co. v. State.
Claim type: Tax Refund
Cases cited: Moline Plow Co. v. State, No. 687a
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction to refund. The decision of the court announced in the case of Moline Plow Co. v. State, supra, governs this claim.
FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction to refund. The decision of the court announced in the case of Moline Plow Co. v. State, supra, governs this claim. ALBERT J. WILL, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; EDWARD C. FITCH, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARITY delivered the opinion of the court:
For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.
Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.