WESTERN NEWSPAPER UNION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of a franchise tax, but the court denied the claim, stating it was controlled by the decision in Moline Plow Co. v. State.

Claim type: Tax Refund

Cases cited: Moline Plow Co. v. State, No. 687a

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction to refund. This case

FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction to refund. This case is controlled by the decision of the court in Moline Plow Co. v. State, supra. TENNEY, HARDING, SHERMAN & ROGERS, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; EDWARD C. FITCH, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARITY delivered the opinion of the court:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.