Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Summer v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-03-10 No. 958
Disposition: (No. 958-Claim denied.) Agency: Attorney General's office
Cite as: Summer v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 (1927)
Legacy General 5 denied 1920s Summer v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284 1927-03-10 (No. 958-Claim denied.) /opinions/v05-p0304-1/

CORA D. SUMMER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $11,135 for an eye injury and extra work while employed as a stenographer. The court sustained the Attorney General's demurrer, finding she failed to comply with Civil Service Law requirements and had accepted her salary, and that the Attorney General properly exercised his discharge power.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant, Cora D. Summer, has filed in this court a claim in the total sum of $11,135.00, on account of a purported injury to her eye, and for extra work done while she was employed, under civil service, as stenographer in the Attorney General's office. To the petition filed on September 10, 1925, the Attorney General has filed a demurrer, which is sustained.

There is a large volume of testimony, and we believe there can be no question as to the ability of Miss Summer to handle the work assigned to her by her various employers.

However, she has not complied with the requirements of the Civil Service Law necessary to entitle her to recover for any [*285] injury to her eye. She has received and accepted the salary allotted to her on acceptance of the positions which she held.

We believe that the Attorney General had the power and authority to discharge the claimant for the reasons set out, as required by the statute, and that he properly exercised his power. The claim is accordingly disallowed.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.