Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Durante v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 302 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-03-10 No. 1118
Disposition: (No. 1118-Claimant awarded $1,500.00.) Award: $1,500.00 Agency: Department of Labor
Cite as: Durante v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 302 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Durante v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 302 1927-03-10 (No. 1118-Claimant awarded $1,500.00.) /opinions/v05-p0322-1/

HECTOR DURANTE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought back pay for a deficiency in salary due to a statutory provision for annual increases that was not accounted for in the appropriation. The court sustained the Attorney General's demurrer as a matter of law but, based on the director of labor's recommendation, awarded $1,500.00.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES & SALARIES-when award will be made. This case is controlled by OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEHM-

Hector Durante presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary allotted to the Chief Inspector in the Division of Private Employment Agencies, in the Department of Labor, for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: "If the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3,000 is reached," and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained, as a matter of law. [*303]

George B. Arnold, director of labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.

We accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $1,500.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.