FRANK E. ARKUSZEWSKI, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought a deficiency in salary for deputy inspector service due to a statutory salary increase not accounted for in the appropriation. The court sustained the Attorney General's demurrer as a matter of law but, following the Director of Labor's recommendation, awarded $41.66.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

FEES & SALARIES-when award will be made. This case is controlled by the decision of the court in Blasi v. State, supra.

FEES & SALARIES-when award will be made. This case is controlled by the decision of the court in Blasi v. State, supra. HARRY SMITZ, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEHNHOFF, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. JUSTICE LEECH delivered the opinion of the court:

Frank E. Arkuszewski presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary, allotted to the chief in[*308]spector in the Division of Private Employment Agencies in the Department of Labor for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: "If the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3,000 is reached," and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained, as a matter of law.

George B. Arnold, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.

We accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $41.66.