Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Reparati v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 392 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-12 No. 1191
Disposition: (No. 1191-Claimant awarded $2,105.00.) Award: $2,105.00 Agency: State Mining Board
Cite as: Reparati v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 392 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Reparati v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 392 1927-05-12 (No. 1191-Claimant awarded $2,105.00.) /opinions/v05-p0412-1/

SCHUYLER E. REPARATI, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant, a member of the State Mining Board, sought unpaid salary due to a legislative increase from $500 to $1,000 per annum that was not appropriated. The court awarded $2,105.00 for the difference from December 5, 1923, to July 1, 1927.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES & SALARIES-when award will be made. Where the salary of a State OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MENNILL F. WEN-

The claimant was appointed in due course as a member of the State Mining Board, and entered upon the duties of his position on the 5th day of December, 1923, and has been continuously employed in said position since the date aforesaid.

It appears that the legislature in making the appropriation for the salary in question, did not take into consideration the law enacted by the Fifty-second General Assembly, offective July 1, 1921, which increased the salary of the members of the State Mining Board from $500.00 to $1,000.00 per annum, being an increase of from $5.00 to $10.00 per day for [*393] 100 days' services per annum; and that the legislature has not appropriated sufficient money to pay the increase in salary which was so provided for by the Fifty-second General Assembly, as aforesaid.

That claimant has been paid by the State of Illinois a salary of $500.00 per annum, being $5.00 per day for 100 days' services per annum, and it appears that there is now due and will be owing to him as unpaid salary from the 5th day of December, 1923, to the 1st day of July, 1927, the sum of $2,105.00, this being the difference between the amount paid him and the amount allowed by the statute, up to July 1, 1927.

The Attorney General, on behalf of the State, has filed his statement in this cause, and makes no defense thereto, but submits the same upon the recommendation of the Director of Mines and Minerals.

The court therefore awards claimant the sum of $2,105.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.