Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 399 Illinois Court of Claims Filed May 10, 1927 No. 691
Disposition: (No. 691-Claimant awarded $55,104.46.) Award: $55,104.46
Cite as: Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 399 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 399 May 10, 1927 (No. 691-Claimant awarded $55,104.46.) /opinions/v05-p0419-1/

MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of excess taxes paid. The court, following its reasoning in the Altorfer Brothers Company case, held that the claimant was entitled to the refund and awarded $55,104.46.

Claim type: Tax Refund

Cases cited: Altorfer Brothers Company

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be awarded. The decision of the EMINENT DOMAIN-judgment of court in condemnation proceeding bind- FORMER ADJUDICATION-same question cannot again be litigated. Where COURT OF CLAIMS-when without jurisdiction. The Court of Claims is

The claim in this case is for the repayment of excess taxes [*400] paid by the claimant. The facts are not in controversy in this case and are substantially the same as those in the case of Altorfer Brothers Company, in which we have filed an opinion today. The questions of law involved are also the same.

There is no question involved here of the Statute of Limitations. For the reasons given in the Altorfer case, we, therefore, are of the opinion that this claimant is entitled to the refund of excess taxes paid aggregating $55,104.46 and that the State should in equity and good conscience repay this sum. The sum is hereby awarded.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.