Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Anderson v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 411 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-26 No. 1039
Disposition: (No. 1039-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) Award: $2,500.00
Cite as: Anderson v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 411 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Anderson v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 411 1927-05-26 (No. 1039-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) /opinions/v05-p0431-1/

ANDREW C. ANDERSON AND ESTHER ANDERSON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimants sought compensation for property allegedly enhanced in value by a new state road. The court found, after personal inspection, that the road did not add value to the property, but recommended an award of $2,500 based on statements from the Department of Public Works and Buildings and the Attorney General.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-award may be made. Inspection by court. There OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

It appears to the court that, from personal inspection of the property and road in question and the recent improvement [*412] thereof, that prior to the time the said State road was built, that there was a very good road on the stretch of road adjacent to said premises, and consequently the new road did not give a value to the property, that it would give in the event that there was a dirt road or inferior road before the last improvement was made, which facts were not disclosed to the court before personal inspection. Consequently, in this particular case, it does not appear to the court that the new road added any particular value to the property of the claimant.

The court is further advised that the Department of Public Works and Buildings had made a statement that the sum of $3000.00 would be a liberal allowance, and the court has been further advised on statements of the Attorney General in open court that, if an award was made, the sum of $2,500.00 would be reasonable.

Therefore, from the records, personal inspection by the court, statement of the Department of Public Works and Buildings and statement of the Attorney General in open court, this court recommends an allowance of $2500.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.