Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Musick v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 425 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-26 No. 1164
Disposition: (No. 1164-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) Award: $3,000.00
Cite as: Musick v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 425 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Musick v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 425 1927-05-26 (No. 1164-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) /opinions/v05-p0445-1/

R. H. MUSICK, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a State Highway patrol officer, was injured when his motorcycle struck a farm wagon while on patrol. The court, applying the Workmen's Compensation Act, awarded $3,000.00 as agreed by the Attorney General.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-award may be made under provisions of. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEHM-

Claimant states that he received an injury on May 18, 1925 in the course of his employment while working as a State Highway patrol officer for the State of Illinois. He alleges that on that day while patrolling on Route No. 8 on the road between El Paso and Eureka in attempting to pass a farm wagon on this road, his motorcycle struck the wagon and the same was overturned and his right leg struck and was broken just above the knee joint.

In passing on this case this court would state that if there was any element in this case that would warrant the consider[*426]ation of the doctrine of reasonable care, it would in the opinion of the court attract attention of the court.

However it seems the only issue for the consideration of the court is the extent of the injury and the amount that should be allowed, having in mind the rules of the Workmen's Compensation Act. It would appear in the first instance that the amount claimed for physicians and nurse is rather high, but as there is no question in this record raised as to whether or not the same was reasonable and customary, it will not be discussed here.

The Attorney General comes and files a statement, that, figuring this claim on the basis of the Workmen's Compensation Law, the claimant is entitled to $3,000.00.

Therefore the court recommends that an award of $3,000.00 be made in this case.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.