Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Thomas v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 25, 1929 No. 1441
Disposition: <caption-cut> Award: $4,000.00
Cite as: Thomas v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 (1929)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1920s Thomas v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 April 25, 1929 <caption-cut> /opinions/v06-p0251-2/

v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Three deceased employees were killed while hauling cinders for road maintenance. The court found their deaths occurred in the line of duty and awarded compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made for injuries resulting in ACTIONS AND DEFENSES-when allowance of an award does not affect OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

These cases are consolidated by agreement between the parties with the consent of the court. The same facts, excepting as to amounts due being involved in each case.

It appears that the deceased in each instance, Joseph Grivetti, George Horn, and Peter Robeza, were employed in the maintenance of hard roads near the Village of Depue, Bureau county, Illinois.

The deceased were, on the morning of January 28, 1929, about 3:30, returning with a load of cinders to the plant of the Mineral Point Zinc Company at Depue, Illinois, and had been during that night hauling cinders from this plant over this railroad crossing to the curves and hills and bad places in the road because of their slick and icy condition. While so operating this State truck they were struck by the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad passenger train traveling west about 3:30 in the morning.

One of the deceased was killed instantly, and the other two died within a very short time.

The amount of damages in these cases following precedents and law must be measured under the Workmen's Com[*232]pensation Act. Therefore, the only controversy before the court is, did these deceased receive their injuries resulting in death in line of duty in the course of their employment, and if so the amount due them under said act.

The court is of the opinion that the deceased received their injuries, resulting in death, in line of duty in the course of their employment, and that these claimants were entirely dependent upon them for support.

It is further stated that the allowance of these awards is not in any way to affect any claim or right of action of any kind whatsoever, which the dependents and next of kin of these deceased or anybody else might have against the railroad company, whose passenger train was the direct cause of the accident and injuries resulting in the death of these deceased.

It is, therefore, recommended that Pauline Grivetti, claimant in claim No. 1487, receive $4,000; that Mary Horn, claimant No. 1488, receive $3,625 and that Johanna Robeza, claimant in claim No. 1441, receive $3,600.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.