Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Hansen v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-05-08 No. 1452
Disposition: (No. 1452-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) Award: $3,000.00 Agency: Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet
Cite as: Hansen v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 (1929)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1920s Hansen v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 275 1929-05-08 (No. 1452-Claimant awarded $3,000.00.) /opinions/v06-p0296-1/

ALBERT A. HANSEN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a keeper at the penitentiary, was seriously and permanently injured in an accident while employed. The court found no legal liability but recommended an award of $3,000.00 due to the circumstances.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made although the State is not

Claimant was employed as a keeper at the penitentiary at Joliet. On the 29th day of November, A. D. 1926, while engaged in his employment, he was seriously and permanently injured in an accident for which he was in no way responsible.

The injury necessitated two operations. His hospital and physician's bills amounted to $568.00, none of which was paid by the State. His condition is such that he has had to be treated by a physician at least once each week since leaving the hospital, and the evidence shows these weekly treatments will have to be continued as long as he lives. As a result of the injury he was incapacitated from work and will never be able to perform any work that requires him to be on his feet. He has a wife, and one child ten years of age.

There is no legal liability on the part of the State to pay claimant compensation for his injuries. But in view of the circumstances under which these injuries were received the Attorney General recommends that claimant be compensated and we feel that he should be. We therefore recommend that the General Assembly allow him the sum of $3,000.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.