Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Nois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 288 1929-05-09 (No. 1478-Claim awarded $255.95.) /opinions/v06-p0309-1/ ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought reimbursement for repairs to a spur track connecting the Illinois Normal University. The court awarded the full amount claimed, noting the work was done without objection and the Attorney General recommended allowance.
Claim type: Contract
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLI-
CONTRACTS-when award will be made. Where it appears that claimant,
CONTRACTS-when award will be made. Where it appears that claimant, a railroad company furnished repairs to a spur track connecting the Illinois Normal University and no objection is made by the State, an award will be made upon the recommendation of the Attorney General. GRAHAM & GRAHAM, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; ROY D. JOHNSON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE CLANTRY delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim filed to recover from the State of Illinois the sum of $255.95 for repairs to a spur track in connecting the Illinois Normal University.
It appears that the work was done and no objections made by those in charge representing the State of Illinois.
It is recommended by the Attorney General that the claim be allowed.
It is therefore considered by the court that claimant be awarded the sum of $255.95.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.