Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Nolan v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-03-12 No. 1235
Disposition: (No. 1235-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Nolan v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 (1930)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Nolan v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 1930-03-12 (No. 1235-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0392-1/

LUKE NOLAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for the loss of his horse, which broke its leg after becoming mired in a mud hole on a highway near Cuba, Illinois. The court denied the claim, finding that the highway was not under state jurisdiction and thus the court lacked jurisdiction.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

The claimant, the owner of a certain horse named Prince, 8 years old, while driving said horse along the highway running to Cuba from the north.

Near the City of Cuba there was a mud hole according to the allegations of claimant and in attempting to pass this spot the horse became mired in said mud hole and sustained a broken leg which it is claimed made it necessary to kill the horse.

It is contended by the State that the highway in question was not taken over by the State under either the $60,000,000 or $100,000,000 bond issue but still being a State aid road and this court would be without jurisdiction.

From all the evidence in this case, it is the opinion of this court that the contention of the defendant is correct and therefore said claim is disallowed.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.