Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Black Star Coal Company v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 379 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-03-12 No. 1500
Disposition: (No. 1500-Claimant awarded $37.50.) Award: $37.50
Cite as: Black Star Coal Company v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 379 (1930)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Black Star Coal Company v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 379 1930-03-12 (No. 1500-Claimant awarded $37.50.) /opinions/v06-p0400-1/

BLACK STAR COAL COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant alleged it overpaid franchise tax by $7.50 per year from 1924 to 1928 due to a computation mistake. The court overruled the State's demurrer, found the payments were made by mistake and not voluntary, and awarded $37.50.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when money paid by mistake may be recovered back.

In its declaration claimant alleges that for the years 1924 to 1928, inclusive, it paid $7.50 more franchise tax each year than it was legally required to pay and that such payments were made by mistake, the mistake occurring in the computation of the tax. The State has filed a general demurrer to the declaration. The declaration is informal but we think it is sufficient in substance to sustain an award and the demurrer, not being special, will be overruled.

That claimant paid the excess tax of $7.50 for the years alleged is not denied; neither is it denied that such payments were made by mistake. Money paid by mistake is not voluntarily paid and can be recovered back by the party making the payment.

Claimant is therefore allowed an award of $37.50.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.