Legacy General 6 dismissed 1930s Mid-Continent Construction Company v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 402 1930-05-28 (No. 1625-Claim dismissed.) /opinions/v06-p0423-1/ MID-CONTINENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant moved to dismiss its own case without prejudice, and the court granted the motion, dismissing the cause without prejudice.
Claim type: Other
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- MID-CONTINENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Claimant, vs. STATE OF
DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. When the court is fully
DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. When the court is fully advised in the premises and it appearing that there is no reason why the case should not be dismissed, it will be dismissed upon motion of the claimant without prejudice. BUSBY, WEBER, MILLER & DONOVAN, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; ROY D. JOHNSON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARDY delivered the opinion of the court:
This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of claimant filed on May 23rd, 1930, to dismiss the above entitled cause without prejudice and the court being fully advised in the premises and it appearing there is no reason why said cause should not be dismissed it is therefore considered by the court that said cause be and the same is hereby dismissed without prejudice upon the motion of the claimant.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.