OSCAR HEINEMAN CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant's case was dismissed with consent of its attorney, as it was controlled by prior decisions in Moline Plow Company v. The State of Illinois and George P. Ide & Company, Inc. v. The State of Illinois.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Moline Plow Company v. The State of Illinois; George P. Ide & Company, Inc. v. The State of Illinois

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where the Attorney General

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where the Attorney General moves the dismissal of the case as being controlled by the decisions heretofore filed, and the attorney for the claimant consents to such motion and to such dismissal the case will be dismissed and the award disallowed. PAPEN & KNOPF, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; DAVID J. KADYK, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARDY delivered the opinion of the court:

Now on this 9th day of September, A. D. 1930, being one of the regular days of the September session of this court, comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, and moves the dismissal of this case as being controlled by the decisions of this court heretofore rendered in the cases of Moline Plow Company v. The State of Illinois, and George P. Ide & Company, Inc. v. The State of Illinois.

And it appearing to the court that the attorney for the claimant herein consents to such a motion and to such dismissal as being controlled by said cases, it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the case be dismissed and the award disallowed.