Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Short v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 426 1930-09-10 (No. 1572-Claimant awarded $208.34.) /opinions/v06-p0447-2/ JAMES SHORT, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought salary based on statutory entitlement. The court, following its opinion in French v. State of Illinois, No. 1573, and with no objection from the respondent, recommended an award of $208.34.
Claim type: Employment Back Pay
Cases cited: John B. French v. The State of Illinois, No. 1573
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FEES AND SALARIES-when State officer entitled to salary fixed by statute.
FEES AND SALARIES-when State officer entitled to salary fixed by statute. This case is controlled by the opinion of the court filed in the case of JOHN B. FRENCH, No. 1573, post. SCANLAN & MASSIEON, for claimant,
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; ROY D. JOHNSON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLANTY delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim based upon the same principle as involved in the opinion of this court in the case of John B. French v.
The State of Illinois, and it appears no objection being made by the defendant, the court recommends that the claimant be allowed the sum of $208.34.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.