Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Scanlan v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 451 1930-11-14 (No. 1579-Claimant awarded $562.50.) /opinions/v06-p0472-1/ WILLIAM M. SCANLAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought back salary for serving as Industrial Officer and Chairman of the Industrial Commission. The court awarded the full amount claimed, $562.50, as the State Auditor confirmed the amount was mathematically correct and the defendant did not object.
Claim type: Employment Back Pay
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FEES AND SALARIES-when State officer entitled to salary fixed by statute.
FEES AND SALARIES-when State officer entitled to salary fixed by statute. Where the salary of a State officer is fixed by statute and the legislature fails to appropriate a sufficient amount to cover such salary, an award will be made for the difference between the amount fixed by statute and the amount appropriated. SCANLAN & MASSIRON, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; ROY D. JOHNSON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE CLANTY delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for back salary for acting as Industrial Officer and Chairman of the Industrial Commission of the [*452] State of Illinois. It appears that there is no objection on the part of the defendant as to the legality of the claim and that the amount claimed $562.50, is admitted to be mathematically correct in a letter from the State Auditor to the Attorney General.
Therefore the court recommends that the claimant be allowed the sum of $562.50.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.