Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Ritz v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-11 No. 1550
Disposition: (No. 1550-Claim denied.) Agency: Department of Agriculture
Cite as: Ritz v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 (1931)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Ritz v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 526 1931-05-11 (No. 1550-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0555-2/

FRANK RITZ, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for two cows destroyed as tubercular reactors under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Act. The court denied the claim because the claimant retained the cows more than thirty days after they were adjudged infected, as prohibited by statute.

Claim type: Other

Statutes cited: Chapter 8, Section 8, Smith-Hurd Ill. Revised Statute 1929

Cases cited: Durand v. Dyson, 271 Ill. 382; Mayfield v. State, 5 Ct. Cl. 226

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ANIMALS-when no award will be made for losses sustained by the

This is a claim for payment under the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Act of 1925, for the loss of two cows destroyed as tubercular reactors.

On April 11, 1929, claimant's herd was tested by a duly authorized veterinarian of the Division of Animal Industry, Department of Agriculture, and two grade cows found to be tubercular. The cows were appraised at $135.00 each. On May 14, 1929, they were taken by truck to the Union Stock Yards in Chicago and sold for $81.70 at a loss to claimant of $178.30.

Chapter 8, Section 8, of Smith-Hurd Ill. Revised Statute 1929 provides: "No compensation shall be paid to any person for any animal condemned for tuberculosis: (4). If the owner retains the animal more than thirty days after it has been adjudged infected with tuberculosis."

Cattle infected with a disease such as tuberculosis become a public nuisance and the State has the power, if deemed necessary to the public welfare, to order their destruction without compensation to the owner. Durand v. Dyson, 271 Ill. 382. Mayfield v. State, 5 Ct. Cl. 226. And if the State sees fit to limit the amount of compensation it will pay to the owner of property destroyed in the exercise of such power or to make payment of compensation contingent upon compliance by the owner with certain imposed conditions no one can question its authority to do so. The statute provides compensation shall not be paid if the owner retains the animal more than thirty days after it has been adjudged infected. That is the law and this court has no power to change it nor to disregard it. The Legislature deemed thirty days ample time for owners of such diseased animals to dispose of them. The claimant in this case kept his cows thirty-two days after they had been tested and tagged as tubercular.

The statute in this case is plain and mandatory, and claimant not having complied with the law is not entitled to any award.

The claim is therefore denied and the case dismissed. [*528]

ARMOUR AND COMPANY v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.