Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Harry E. Blackwell v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 528 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1559
Disposition: (No. 1559-Claimant awarded $2,437.50.) Award: $2,437.50 Agency: Grain Inspection Bureau, Department of Trade and Commerce
Cite as: Harry E. Blackwell v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 528 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Harry E. Blackwell v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 528 1931-05-14 (No. 1559-Claimant awarded $2,437.50.) /opinions/v06-p0557-1/

HARRY E. BLACKWELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, slipped and fell from a freight car while obtaining grain samples, fracturing his left leg and right foot. The court found 50% disability and awarded $2,437.50.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. The court recommends an

Claimant was an employee of the State of Illinois and fifty-nine years old. He was employed by the Grain Inspection Bureau, Department of Trade and Commerce. His work consisted of obtaining samples of grain out of cars. While employed at this work on December 22, 1924, he slipped and fell while getting down from the top of a freight car. He fell feet first, striking a brick paved platform and suffered injury to both legs, fracturing bones in his left leg and right foot as a result of the fall. Claimant was confined in the hospital for a time. It is conceded that he has carried a crutch or cane ever since the accident.

The Attorney General comes and recommends in the event of liability of the respondent being established that the claimant be allowed on a basis of 50% disability. We are of the opinion this is correct.

Therefore, the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,437.50.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.