Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Van Gorder v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 529 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1561
Disposition: (No. 1561-1521-Claimant awarded $430.00.) Award: $430.00
Cite as: Van Gorder v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 529 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Van Gorder v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 529 1931-05-14 (No. 1561-1521-Claimant awarded $430.00.) /opinions/v06-p0558-1/

ARTHUR VAN GORDER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a State Highway Patrol Officer, sought compensation for injuries and property damage from an accident occurring on February 10, 1926. The court recommended an award of $430.00 for both claims, finding $300.00 fair for the automobile loss and covering medical expenses.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. The court recommends an

It appears that the two above mentioned claims grew out of one accident which occurred on Feb. 10th, 1926, and in filing the opinion the court believes that said claims be treated jointly.

It appears that claimant was employed by the State of Illinois as a State Highway Patrol Officer and he alleges that while in the performance of his duties as such highway patrol officer under authority from his superior that he was severely injured at a point on State Highway No. 5 a short distance from Elizabeth, JoDavies county, Illinois. The claimant in No. 1521 asked for the sum of One Hundred and Thirty ($130.00) Dollars for doctor, hospital and ambulance bills.

The car driven by claimant which was struck by a truck it is [*630] claimed was almost totally destroyed and the claimant asked Four Hundred and Fifteen ($415.00) Dollars. The court is of the opinion that this is a value greater than the amount sustained but that Three Hundred ($300.00) Dollars would be a fair return for the loss sustained on account of automobile.

The Attorney General comes and makes no objections as to the facts set forth by the claimant and after a full consideration in the matter the court recommends that claimant be allowed in full for both claims the sum of Four Hundred and Thirty ($430.00) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.