Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Grimes v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1633
Disposition: (No. 1633-Claimant awarded $150.00.) Award: $150.00
Cite as: Grimes v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Grimes v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541 1931-05-14 (No. 1633-Claimant awarded $150.00.) /opinions/v06-p0570-2/

JAMES F. GRIMES, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $323 for damage to hay and timberland from a fire allegedly spreading from a state highway right-of-way. The court found the Attorney General's recommendation of $150 fair and reasonable and awarded that amount.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when award will be made. Where claimant suffers property damage as a result of a fire spreading upon his land from the right of way of a State Bond Issue Route, an award will be recommended for the damages sustained.

[*512] This is a claim for property damage in the sum of Three Hundred and Twenty-three ($323.00) Dollars, for damage to about 18 acres of hay and timberland as a result of a fire on July 15th, 1930. It is claimed that the fire spread from the right of way of State Bond Issue Route 142.

It appears that some damage was done to the property of claimant through this fire and the Attorney General recommends that claimant be allowed a sum not to exceed One Hundred and Fifty ($150.00) Dollars. The court is of the opinion that this allowance is fair and reasonable and therefore recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of One Hundred and Fifty ($150.00) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.