Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Rudow v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-11 No. 1638
Disposition: (No. 1638-Claim denied.) Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: Rudow v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543 (1931)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Rudow v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 543 1931-05-11 (No. 1638-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0572-2/

FRANK RUDOW, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $88.30 for damage to his garage door caused by a state truck driver. The court denied the claim, recommending the owner seek recourse from the driver for carelessness.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-when no award will be made. The court recommends OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

According to claimant's statement, he was the owner of a certain brick garage building situated in the City of Morris in the State of Illinois; that said garage was rented to the State of Illinois for the use of the Division of Highways for one motor truck. It appears that the driver of a Reo motor truck drove through the door of said garage damaging the door in the sum of Eighty-eight and 30/100 ($88.30) Dollars, according to claimant.

This court is of the opinion that the owner of the garage should take action if any against the truck driver as there must be some carelessness somewhere, and this court recommends that this claim be disallowed.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.