Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

William Clevermann v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1649
Disposition: (No. 1649-Claimant awarded $1,100.00.) Award: $1,100.00 Agency: Kankakee State Hospital
Cite as: William Clevermann v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s William Clevermann v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 547 1931-05-14 (No. 1649-Claimant awarded $1,100.00.) /opinions/v06-p0576-1/

WILLIAM CLEVERMANN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a wagon maker at Kankakee State Hospital, lost his right thumb and index finger when his hand slipped into machine knives while straightening lumber. The court found the claim fell under the Workmen's Compensation Act and awarded $1,100.00.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation Act. Where claimant suffers injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment while working as a wagon maker for the State, an award will be made under the Workmen's Compensation Act. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant alleges that he was injured at the Kankakee State Hospital, Kankakee, Illinois, on May 21st, 1929. He was employed as a wagon maker and while he was attempting to straighten a piece of lumber claimant's hand slipped into the knives on the machine cutting off his right thumb and his right index finger.

The Attorney General comes and defends and recommends that if the court believes the claimant comes under the Workmen's Compensation Act that he be allowed $1,100.00.

The court is of the opinion that this case does come under the Workmen's Compensation Act and, therefore, recommends the allowance of $1,100.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.