Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Alexander-Daley Lumber Co. v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 567 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1719
Disposition: (No. 1719-Claimant awarded $1,281.41.) Award: $1,281.41 Agency: Department of Purchases and Construction
Cite as: Alexander-Daley Lumber Co. v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 567 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Alexander-Daley Lumber Co. v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 567 1931-05-14 (No. 1719-Claimant awarded $1,281.41.) /opinions/v06-p0596-1/

ALEXANDER-DALEY LUMBER CO., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought $1,281.41 for materials furnished to the State for construction of the Illinois Waterway. The Attorney General admitted the materials were used and unpaid, and the court awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ALEXANDER-DALEY LUMBER CO., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, MATERIALS-when award will be made for materials furnished. Where OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant files its claim for $1,281.41 for material furnished the State of Illinois through the Department of Purchases and Construction in connection with the construction of the Illinois Waterway near Joliet, Illinois.

The material was furnished by the claimant and was used by the State and has never been paid for and the claim is now due and unpaid.

The Attorney General comes and admits that the material was furnished by the claimant and was used by the State of Illinois and recommends to the court that the claim be allowed in the sum of $1,281.41.

The court makes an award for the sum of $1,281.41 to the complainant.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.