Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Thomas R. Crabb v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 572 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-05-14 No. 1736
Disposition: (No. 1736-Claimant awarded $128.00.) Award: $128.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Thomas R. Crabb v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 572 (1931)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1930s Thomas R. Crabb v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 572 1931-05-14 (No. 1736-Claimant awarded $128.00.) /opinions/v06-p0601-1/

THOMAS R. CRABB, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, an automobile investigator employed by the Secretary of State, was injured while riding a state-furnished motorcycle when he attempted to pass a vehicle and was thrown onto streetcar tracks. He claimed $128.00 for hospital and doctor bills, which the court found fair and reasonable and awarded.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made for hospital and doctor

The claimant, an automobile investigator, employed by the Secretary of State, was injured during the month of June, 1929, while riding a motorcycle furnished him by the office of Secretary of State. He was attempting to pass a motor vehicle on Route No. 4 and as he was passing his car caught the fender of the car he was attempting to pass and threw him from the motorcycle on the street car tracks and injured his face, head and mouth and left him permanently scarred and he files this claim for $128.00 for hospital bill and doctor bills paid by him. The court finds the amount paid to be fair and reasonable.

The claimant is allowed an award in the sum of $128.00 for his hospital bills and doctor bills.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.